Donald's Pool Won't Hold Its Coating. His Vandal Story Holds Everything.

Political satire. The repair meeting, officials' exchanges, and dialogue below are invented. The contracts, installation problems, and prosecution are documented in the sources.

Key Takeaways

• The work was awarded without competitive bidding. This was not a documented lowest-bid victory. The coating and filtration work involved different contractors.
• Evidence of rushed, flawed installation undermined the vandalism prosecution of former Olympian David Hearn. His case was dismissed with prejudice.
• Trump gave conflicting accounts of his relationship with the coating contractor and continued blaming vandals after the evidence pointed to construction failures.

The emergency repair meeting

Donald Trump called an emergency meeting after discovering that his beautiful new pool coating had exercised its right to leave the pool.

The engineer wanted to discuss installation. The accountant wanted to discuss contracts. The prosecutor wanted to discuss evidence.

Donald wanted to discuss which one of them was going to find him a vandal.

"The lining is coming up," the engineer said.

"Then arrest whoever is underneath it."

Competitive bidding would have slowed down the emergency

The procurement officer explained that the work had been awarded without a competitive bidding process. The stated urgency was completing it for the country's 250th anniversary celebrations. 1

Donald was pleased. A normal project might spend weeks comparing proposals. His administration had saved that time for explaining why the project needed more work.

"Did we get the lowest bid?" he asked.

"We didn't hold that competition."

"Then nobody beat us."

The accountant began writing down the rules of this new kind of savings. Apparently, if you didn't ask what anyone else would charge, every price was a bargain.

The contractor has entered witness protection

The communications aide brought a chronology. Trump had described calling pool contractors who had worked for him, then later said Interior had selected a contractor he did not know and had never used. The White House told PolitiFact that he knew the company's work but had no personal relationship with the contractor. 2

"Which version are we using?" she asked.

"How's the pool looking?"

She showed him the peeling.

"Never met him."

There was a separate complication. A different company, owned by a Trump donor, had received the filtration contract. The accountant underlined the word "different." One failed explanation did not require mixing up two companies. 3

Donald asked whether underlining things was covered by the original contract or would require a supplemental award.

The only thing that stuck was the invoice

The coating contract had grown to approximately $14.7 million. The separate water-treatment award was roughly $1.7 million. 34

The accountant suggested that the president stop describing the job as cheap until somebody had finished describing the bill.

"It's a very sophisticated system," Donald said.

The engineer agreed that it had produced an unusual result: blue material floating on green water, while everyone responsible remained comfortably on dry land.

He wanted to discuss preparation, curing, and whether the product had been applied correctly. Donald asked whether a better shade of blue would solve any of those things.

"The failure is underneath the color."

"Then the public won't see it."

The engineer held up a loose piece.

"They can now."

Have you tried arresting a canoeist?

The prosecutor's file concerned David Hearn, the former Olympic canoeist charged with felony destruction of property over the pool. The government later sought dismissal after evidence pointed to contractor errors and rushed installation. 45

Donald thought the Olympic connection was promising. Here was somebody with a documented history of going near water. Surely that saved the investigators several steps.

The prosecutor explained that competence at canoeing was not evidence of sabotaging a coating system.

"What about the photographs?"

"We have installation records."

"Do the records look guilty?"

"They look like installation records."

Donald requested something with a more arrestable face.

The engineer tried to explain that a criminal charge did not make primer bond to concrete. He had checked. It wasn't on the manufacturer's instructions.

The case is closed. The excuse remains open.

A judge ultimately dismissed Hearn's case with prejudice. Trump continued publicly blaming vandals for the pool's problems despite the evidence cited by prosecutors. 56

The communications aide asked whether they should correct the public explanation.

"The explanation has never peeled," Donald said. "Why would we replace the part that's working?"

They returned to the technical problem. The coating needed to stay attached to the pool. The president's story needed to stay detached from the coating contractor. These were now separate workstreams.

At the end of the meeting, the engineer submitted a plan for making the repairs last. The accountant submitted a cost breakdown. The prosecutor submitted the case disposition.

Donald submitted a name for the next ribbon-cutting ceremony.

It was his.

The procurement officer asked whether they should wait until the work passed inspection.

Donald looked offended. They had already skipped the competition. There was no reason to get fussy about the result.

Factual FAQs

Was this a lowest-bid contract?

No competitive bidding process was used for the coating and filtration awards. Interior invoked urgency related to the July 4 anniversary events. That does not establish who would have been the cheapest qualified bidder. 1

Was the contractor a friend or donor of Trump's?

The relationships must be distinguished. Trump gave conflicting accounts concerning the coating contractor, Atlantic Industrial Coatings. Separately, the filtration award went to Green Water Solutions, whose ownership was linked to Trump donor John J. Cafaro. That does not establish a bribe or make the two contractors interchangeable. 23

What evidence pointed to bad construction?

The government's dismissal motion cited flawed installation and a rushed schedule. Later reporting described additional coating-application and curing problems. Those findings undermined the theory that vandalism explained the widespread failures. 46

Was David Hearn convicted of damaging the pool?

No. He was charged, but the case was dismissed. The judge ultimately dismissed it with prejudice, preventing prosecutors from bringing that case again. An accusation is not a conviction. 5

Sources

1. ABC News: Contracts awarded without competitive bidding.
2. PolitiFact: Trump's conflicting accounts of the contractor relationship.
3. CBS News: Separate filtration contract awarded to a Trump donor's company.
4. FactCheck.org: DOJ dismissal motion and installation evidence.
5. ABC News: Hearn's case dismissed with prejudice.
6. FactCheck.org: Continued vandalism claims.

Related: Trumpster: The Dumpster Fire Has a Soundtrack and Donald Introduces His Legislative Agenda: No..